Wiki source code of WebObjects and Squeryl
Version 162.1 by Ravi Mendis on 2010/11/10 00:03
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | = Squeryl ~= //SQL-like// DSL for Scala = | ||
| 2 | |||
| 3 | Advantages of Squeryl over EOF: | ||
| 4 | |||
| 5 | * Concurrent | ||
| 6 | ** Spawns multiple database connections | ||
| 7 | ** Issues database transactions concurrently | ||
| 8 | * Scala Actor compatible | ||
| 9 | * Immutable object model/graph | ||
| 10 | * Strongly-typed | ||
| 11 | ** Better suited for business "logic". | ||
| 12 | E.g: Exploiting the compiler and IDE to catch exceptions at compile time rather than at run-time. | ||
| 13 | * Uses Scala (functional) collection classes | ||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | = Migrating EOF -> Squeryl = | ||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | In keeping with the strong-typed philosophy of Scala, Squeryl has no dynamic component like EOF (i.e an EO model file). | ||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | EOF though has the ability to generate classes in Java (and in Objective-C prior to WebObjects 4.5) enforcing type as has become customary in enterprise environments. We may exploit this feature of EOF to generate a Squeryl schema. | ||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | * Squeryl Templates | ||
| 22 | ** Entity.eotemplate [[template>>WOL:Squeryl _Entity.eotemplate]] | ||
| 23 | ** Entity.eotemplate [[template>>WOL:Squeryl Entity.eotemplate]] |