Skip to Content

Changes for page WebObjects and Squeryl

Last modified by Ravi Mendis on 2011/04/01 11:14
From version 111.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2010/11/10 06:24
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 113.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2010/11/10 06:22
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
16 16  
17 17  In contrast to EOF Squeryl maintains its ORM information programmatically - in the classes itself and collectively in a [[schema>>http://squeryl.org/schema-definition.html]]. In keeping with the strongly-typed philosophy of Scala, Squeryl has no dynamic component like EOF (i.e an EO model file).
18 18  
19 -EOF has the ability to generate classes in Java (and in Objective-C prior to WebObjects 4.5) because enforcing type has become customary in enterprise environments. We may exploit this feature of EOF to generate a Squeryl schema from an EO model.
19 +EOF has the ability to generate classes in Java (and in Objective-C prior to WebObjects 4.5) because enforcing type has become customary in enterprise environments. We may exploit this feature of EOF to generate a Squeryl schema.
20 20  
21 21  === Preparing your EO model ===
22 22