Skip to Content

Changes for page WebObjects and Squeryl

Last modified by Ravi Mendis on 2011/04/01 11:14
From version 106.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2010/11/10 05:44
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 109.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2010/11/10 05:40
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1 1  = Squeryl ~= //SQL-like// DSL for Scala =
2 2  
3 -Advantages of [[Squeryl>>http://squeryl.org/]] over EOF:
3 +Advantages of Squeryl over EOF:
4 4  
5 5  * Concurrent
6 6  ** Spawns multiple database connections
... ... @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
14 14  
15 15  = Migrating EOF -> Squeryl =
16 16  
17 -In contrast to EOF Squeryl maintains its ORM information programmatically - in the classes itself and collectively in a [[schema>>http://squeryl.org/schema-definition.html]]. In keeping with the strongly-typed philosophy of Scala, Squeryl has no dynamic component like EOF (i.e an EO model file).
17 +In contrast to EOF Squeryl maintains its ORM information programmatically - in the classes itself and collectively in a ##schema##. In keeping with the strongly-typed philosophy of Scala, Squeryl has no dynamic component like EOF (i.e an EO model file).
18 18  
19 19  EOF has the ability to generate classes in Java (and in Objective-C prior to WebObjects 4.5) as enforcing type has become customary in enterprise environments. We may exploit this feature of EOF to generate a Squeryl schema.
20 20