Changes for page ERPrototaculous
Last modified by Ravi Mendis on 2010/11/18 05:07
From version 205.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2009/07/21 03:55
on 2009/07/21 03:55
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -24,17 +24,17 @@ 24 24 25 25 ==== Prototype WebObjects Elements ==== 26 26 27 -##Ajax.Updater## and ##Ajax.Request## have been implemented as WebObjects elements. 27 +##Ajax.Updater## and ##Ajax.Request## have been implemented as WebObjects dynamic elements. 28 28 29 29 ===== Ajax.Updater ===== 30 30 31 -Support for Prototype's [[Ajax.Updater>>http://www.prototypejs.org/api/ajax/updater]] is in the form of three elements:31 +Support for Prototype's [[Ajax.Updater>>http://www.prototypejs.org/api/ajax/updater]] is in the form of three components: 32 32 33 33 * AjaxUpdaterLink 34 34 * AjaxUpdaterButton 35 35 * AjaxUpdaterForm (with ##onsubmit## for ajax form submission) 36 36 37 -These components will update //any//**container** on the page:37 +These components will update a **container** on the page: 38 38 39 39 {{code value="javascript"}} 40 40 ... ... @@ -67,14 +67,14 @@ 67 67 68 68 Support for these widgets have been similarly implemented as **button** and **link** variants, depending whether it is used inside a form or not. 69 69 70 -== AjaxForms in ERPrototaculous ==70 +== Forms in ERPrototaculous == 71 71 72 72 Differences from using forms in WebObjects. i.e ##WOForm##: 73 73 74 -1. All ajaxform controls must be named. This includes text fields, selects and buttons.74 +1. All form controls must be named. This includes text fields, selects and buttons. 75 75 (WebObjects dynamically assigned names are not compatible with ERPrototaculous). 76 76 1. All ajax forms in an ERPrototaculous app need to be instances of ##AjaxUpdaterForm##. 77 -1. Ajax form submit buttons can be a:77 +1. Form submit buttons can be a: 78 78 79 79 * 80 80 ** Static ##<button>##. ... ... @@ -87,16 +87,10 @@ 87 87 In ERPrototaculous you may still have typical WebObjects forms (i.e WOForm) as well as use ajax forms (i.e **AjaxUpdaterForm**). 88 88 They behave differently in that an AjaxUpdaterForm will update the contents of a container as opposed to the entire page. 89 89 90 -{{warning title="Warning"}} 91 - 92 -You must *name your form controls*, otherwise under certain circumstances Prototype (ajax) form submission will break. 93 - 94 -{{/warning}} 95 - 96 96 == Ajax Response Handling in ERPrototaculous == 97 97 98 98 One notable difference between the ERPrototaculous and Ajax frameworks is in the way they handle ajax responses. 99 -In ERPrototaculous, updates and actions break with //The WebObjects Way//by being pseudo-stateless.93 +In ERPrototaculous, updates and actions break with "The WebObjects Way" by being pseudo-stateless. 100 100 101 101 WebObjects typically vends a fresh response for each and every action. With ajax, this is not necessary. 102 102 ... ... @@ -106,14 +106,8 @@ 106 106 107 107 So for ajax, the current state of the page fragment component is all that is necessary. 108 108 109 - {{infotitle="NoMore"}}103 +== Actions in ERPrototaculous == 110 110 111 -A 100% ajax WO-app (like an [ERDivaLook|ERDivaLook] app) will no longer be plagued by the well known _limitation_ of WebObjects - the browser *backtrack problem*. 112 - 113 -{{/info}} 114 - 115 -== Ajax Actions in ERPrototaculous == 116 - 117 117 Typically, in a WebObjects application, an action would return the contents of the entire page. 118 118 119 119 Ajax responses are mostly page fragments or just part of a page. ... ... @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ 120 120 So you should make sure the actions in ERPrototaculous (or AjaxUpdaterButton and AjaxRequestButton) return the proper page fragment as opposed to the entire page. 121 121 This breaks with WO-tradition, so this is where you need to be careful. 122 122 123 -{{note title=" Note"}}111 +{{note title="Actions"}} 124 124 125 125 ERPrototaculous actions *differ* from Ajax.framework actions - _They must return only the page fragment_. 126 126 ... ... @@ -135,4 +135,3 @@ 135 135 It is similar to an AjaxUpdateContainer when it has the binding ##ajax = true##, otherwise it's pretty much like **WOGenericContainer**. 136 136 137 137 It has been implemented as a utility or //convenience// for Prototype's ##Ajax.Updater##. 138 -That is it can be used to update from a popup //onchange//, or from a Prototype //callback// like //onComplete//, etc.