Changes for page ERPrototaculous
Last modified by Ravi Mendis on 2010/11/18 05:07
From version 174.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2009/07/17 03:41
on 2009/07/17 03:41
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 170.1
edited by Ravi Mendis
on 2009/07/20 08:10
on 2009/07/20 08:10
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ 24 24 25 25 ==== Prototype WebObjects Elements ==== 26 26 27 -##Ajax.Updater## and ##Ajax.Request## have been implemented as WebObjects dynamicelements.27 +##Ajax.Updater## and ##Ajax.Request## have been implemented as WebObjects elements. 28 28 29 29 ===== Ajax.Updater ===== 30 30 31 -Support for Prototype's [[Ajax.Updater>>http://www.prototypejs.org/api/ajax/updater]] is in the form of three components:31 +Support for Prototype's [[Ajax.Updater>>http://www.prototypejs.org/api/ajax/updater]] is in the form of three elements: 32 32 33 33 * AjaxUpdaterLink 34 34 * AjaxUpdaterButton ... ... @@ -67,14 +67,14 @@ 67 67 68 68 Support for these widgets have been similarly implemented as **button** and **link** variants, depending whether it is used inside a form or not. 69 69 70 -== Forms in ERPrototaculous == 70 +== Ajax Forms in ERPrototaculous == 71 71 72 72 Differences from using forms in WebObjects. i.e ##WOForm##: 73 73 74 -1. All form controls must be named. This includes text fields, selects and buttons. 74 +1. All ajax form controls must be named. This includes text fields, selects and buttons. 75 75 (WebObjects dynamically assigned names are not compatible with ERPrototaculous). 76 -1. All forms in an ERPrototaculous app are instances of ##AjaxUpdaterForm##.77 -1. Form submit buttons can bethe form ofa:76 +1. All ajax forms in an ERPrototaculous app need to be instances of ##AjaxUpdaterForm##. 77 +1. Ajax form submit buttons can be a: 78 78 79 79 * 80 80 ** Static ##<button>##. ... ... @@ -85,26 +85,38 @@ 85 85 So forms are different in Ajax.framework and ERPrototaculous. 86 86 87 87 In ERPrototaculous you may still have typical WebObjects forms (i.e WOForm) as well as use ajax forms (i.e **AjaxUpdaterForm**). 88 -They behave differently in that n AjaxUpdaterForm will update the contents of a container as opposed to the entire page. 88 +They behave differently in that an AjaxUpdaterForm will update the contents of a container as opposed to the entire page. 89 89 90 - == Ajax Page Caching inERPrototaculous==90 +{{warning title="Name your form controls!"}} 91 91 92 -One notable difference in the ERPrototaculous and Ajax.framework is in the ajax responses. 93 -In ERPrototaculous, updates and actions break with "The WebObjects Way" by being pseudo-stateless. 92 +You must name your form controls, otherwise under certain circumstances the ajax form submission will break. 94 94 94 +{{/warning}} 95 + 96 +== Ajax Response Handling in ERPrototaculous == 97 + 98 +One notable difference between the ERPrototaculous and Ajax frameworks is in the way they handle ajax responses. 99 +In ERPrototaculous, updates and actions break with //The WebObjects Way// by being pseudo-stateless. 100 + 95 95 WebObjects typically vends a fresh response for each and every action. With ajax, this is not necessary. 96 96 97 97 In a typical WebObjects application, when a user clicks on the back button and clicks on a link in on that page in the browser history, WebObjects needs to remember how to handle that action and to return the correct page. This is no longer true for ajax. 98 98 The reason is a user never travels backwards or forwards through the ajax application history. 99 -(i.e there is no forward/back buttons in a 100% ajax app - as there isn't in desktop app).105 +(i.e there is no forward/back buttons in a 100% ajax app - as there aren't in desktop apps). 100 100 101 101 So for ajax, the current state of the page fragment component is all that is necessary. 102 102 103 - == Actionsin ERPrototaculous==109 +{{info title="No More"}} 104 104 111 +A 100% ajax WO-app (like an [ERDivaLook|ERDivaLook] app) will no longer be plagued by the well known _limitation_ of WebObjects - the browser *backtrack problem*. 112 + 113 +{{/info}} 114 + 115 +== Ajax Actions in ERPrototaculous == 116 + 105 105 Typically, in a WebObjects application, an action would return the contents of the entire page. 106 106 107 -Ajax responses are t ypically page fragments or part of a page.119 +Ajax responses are mostly page fragments or just part of a page. 108 108 So you should make sure the actions in ERPrototaculous (or AjaxUpdaterButton and AjaxRequestButton) return the proper page fragment as opposed to the entire page. 109 109 This breaks with WO-tradition, so this is where you need to be careful. 110 110 ... ... @@ -120,4 +120,6 @@ 120 120 121 121 Perhaps the only real similarity to Ajax.framework is the ajax update container. 122 122 **WXGenericContainer** is the ERPrototaculous update container. 123 -It will behave like an AjaxUpdateContainer when it has the binding ##ajax = true;##, otherwise it acts like **WOGenericContainer**. 135 +It is similar to an AjaxUpdateContainer when it has the binding ##ajax = true##, otherwise it's pretty much like **WOGenericContainer**. 136 + 137 +It has been implemented as a utility or //convenience// for Prototype's ##Ajax.Updater##.