Last modified by Pascal Robert on 2023/08/10 22:21

From version 178.1
edited by Marc Guenther
on 2023/08/10 16:00
Change comment: API is missing sanity checks
To version 185.2
edited by David Avendasora
on 2023/11/13 11:56
Change comment: Updated the relative links.

Summary

Details

Page properties
Parent
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +Deployment
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.marc
1 +XWiki.avendasora
Tags
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +favourite|deployment
Content
... ... @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
16 16  
17 17  You can either download them pre-built from [[Wonder's Jenkins build server>>url:http://jenkins.wocommunity.org/job/Wonder7/lastSuccessfulBuild/||shape="rect"]] or build them from the source code.
18 18  
19 -To build them from the [[Wonder source code>>doc:WEB.Getting the Wonder Source Code]], simply run the following command from the Wonder directory at the root of the Wonder source.
19 +To build them from the [[Wonder source code>>doc:WEB.Home.Getting Started.Getting the Wonder Source Code.WebHome]], simply run the following command from the Wonder directory at the root of the Wonder source.
20 20  
21 21  {{code}}
22 22  ant frameworks deployment.tools -Ddeployment.standalone=true
... ... @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
204 204  
205 205  ==== Remote Control via REST Routes (for JavaMonitor) ====
206 206  
207 -If the control offered by the Direct Actions isn't enough, JavaMonitor allows additional control via [[REST>>doc:ERRest Framework]] calls. Between the two methods (Direct Actions, REST) you have almost full remote-control of JavaMonitor. Just make sure that your JavaMonitor installation is secure! Just like with Direct Actions, you need to append {{code language="none"}}?pw=XXXX{{/code}} to the URLs if your JavaMonitor is password protected.
207 +If the control offered by the Direct Actions isn't enough, JavaMonitor allows additional control via [[REST>>doc:documentation.ERRest Framework]] calls. Between the two methods (Direct Actions, REST) you have almost full remote-control of JavaMonitor. Just make sure that your JavaMonitor installation is secure! Just like with Direct Actions, you need to append {{code language="none"}}?pw=XXXX{{/code}} to the URLs if your JavaMonitor is password protected.
208 208  
209 209  Be careful with these. This allows to do illegal stuff, that the UI wouldn't allow, for example, create two applications with the same name.
210 210  
... ... @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@
309 309  
310 310  {{code title="Adding a New Instance" 0="none"}}
311 311  
312 -curl -X GET http://wotaskdhost:port/cgi-bin/WebObjects/JavaMonitor.woa/ra/mApplications/AjaxExample/addInstance&host=localhost
312 +curl -X GET http://wotaskdhost:port/cgi-bin/WebObjects/JavaMonitor.woa/ra/mApplications/AjaxExample/addInstance?host=localhost
313 313  
314 314  {{/code}}
315 315  
... ... @@ -495,4 +495,4 @@
495 495  
496 496  === Troubleshooting ===
497 497  
498 -If JavaMonitor won't start up check the [[troubleshooting deployment>>doc:Troubleshooting Deployment]] section. In particular pay attention to the [[WOTaskd Didn't Start>>doc:Troubleshooting Deployment]] Q&A.
498 +If JavaMonitor won't start up check the [[troubleshooting deployment>>doc:documentation.Home.Deployment.Troubleshooting.Troubleshooting Deployment.WebHome]] section. In particular pay attention to the [[WOTaskd Didn't Start>>doc:documentation.Home.Deployment.Troubleshooting.Troubleshooting Deployment.WebHome]] Q&A.
WonderJavaMonitor.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.XWikiGuest
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +32.7 KB
Content
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.dholt
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
1 +In Misc it says that wotaskd and JavaMonitor are not built fully embedded. Is this still true? I thought with the move to Hudson, that the Applications were fully embedded at this location: [[http:~~/~~/webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder54/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/>>url:http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder54/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/dist/||rel="nofollow" shape="rect" class="external-link"]]
2 +
3 +Can anyone confirm this so that we remove this information if incorrect?
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2010-11-26 19:47:32.0
XWiki.XWikiComments[1]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.probert
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
1 +The wotaskd/Monitor builds on webobjects.mdimension.com are fully embedded, but if you build them yourself, they are not fully embedded unless you use the "-Ddeployment.standalone=true" argument.
2 +
3 +And I just saw that the Wonder-latest-Applications* archive doesn't exist anymore in Hudson, but wotaskd and JavaMonitor are available as downloads and they are fully embedded.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2010-11-26 20:40:32.0
XWiki.XWikiComments[2]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.dholt
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +I have updated that section. Thanks Pascal.
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2010-11-26 21:48:35.0
XWiki.XWikiComments[3]
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.tedpet
Comment
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@
1 +On a Centos VM that I just created I tried to build both wotaskd/Monitor. There were errors until I told ant where the frameworks lived.
2 +
3 +ant -Dwo.system.frameworks=/opt/WO/Library/Frameworks frameworks deployment.tools -Ddeployment.standalone=true
Date
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +2016-07-01 08:21:16.993