Changes for page Getting Started with Git
Last modified by Bastian Triller on 2013/05/21 17:24
From version 195.1
edited by Kieran Kelleher
on 2011/04/29 12:14
on 2011/04/29 12:14
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 196.1
edited by David Avendasora
on 2011/04/25 15:06
on 2011/04/25 15:06
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. kieran1 +XWiki.avendasora - Content
-
... ... @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ 10 10 * [[Excellent Concept Tutorial on Git>>http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~~cduan/technical/git/]] 11 11 12 12 Have a Good Laugh here as Linus Torvalds Evangelizes git: 13 -//this is more fun than learning, but gives you insight into the motivation behind git// 13 +//this is more fun than learning, but gives you insight into the motivation behind git!// 14 14 15 15 * [[Linus Torvalds talks about git>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8]] 16 16 ... ... @@ -54,32 +54,11 @@ 54 54 For those of you who just get panic attacks at the thought of using the Terminal, there is a commercial app for that: 55 55 [[Git Tower>>http://www.git-tower.com/]] 56 56 57 -I use Tower (bought it), but only for committing and fixing merge conflicts. I think Tower misses quite a bit of the flagship feature of GIT: branches. You can't see a branch tree graphically, like you can with gitX or even the command line (git log -graph -color, IIRC). But it's cool for committing. For everything else I use command line. 58 - Miguel Arroz 57 +I use Tower (bought it), but only for committing and fixing merge conflicts. I think Tower misses quite a bit of the flagship feature of GIT: branches. You can't see a branch tree graphically, like you can with gitX or even the command line (git log ---graph ---color, IIRC). But it's cool for committing. For everything else I use command line. 58 +- Miguel Arroz 59 59 60 -= =Using git locally on a Subversion Working Copy ==60 += Using git locally on a Subversion Working Copy = 61 61 62 -OK, so you are addicted to git, and now you have to work on a team project that is hosted in a remote subversion repository ... and it is making you depressed :-( 62 +OK, so you are addicted to git, and now you have to work on a team project that is hosted in a remote subversion repository ... and it is making you depressed :-(. Well, you can use manage your local svn working copy using git and be happy again! 63 63 64 64 I recommend you just use the [[git+svn protocol>>http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/derickbailey/archive/2010/02/03/branch-per-feature-how-i-manage-subversion-with-git-branches.aspx]]. 65 - 66 -== Git Concepts == 67 - 68 -=== Rebasing === 69 - 70 -Rebasing is unique to git. There is no counterpart in Subversion. 71 - 72 -Rebasing cuts down on the spaghetti history of merging and helps to keep history nice and linear. 73 - 74 -Conceptually, when I rebase my current branch A on another branch B, git removes all my branch A commits back to the common ancestor of A and B, stashes those commits away temporarily, moves the head of the current branch A to the tip of the other branch B, and then re-applys all my stashed commits as **new commit** patches to my branch B. 75 - 76 -However before using it on work that is shared with others you MUST follow the these rules, otherwise you will screw everyone else on the project. 77 - 78 -* If you don't understand rebasing, don't use it! 79 -* Use rebase on **private** branches 80 -* Use rebase for commits that have **not been pushed** to a remote repo 81 - 82 -[[http://progit.org/book/ch3-6.html]] 83 -[[http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~~cduan/technical/git/git-5.shtml]] 84 -[[http://book.git-scm.com/4_rebasing.html]] 85 -[[http://blip.tv/file/4094727]]